<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Godfread Law Firm - Intellectual Property and Business Law &#187; free speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/tag/free-speech/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.godfreadlaw.com</link>
	<description>A Minneapolis-St. Paul law firm practicing trademark, copyright, technology and business law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 17:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why I Volunteered for the EFF</title>
		<link>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/why-i-volunteered-for-the-eff</link>
		<comments>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/why-i-volunteered-for-the-eff#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP addresses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godfreadlaw.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group called the U.S. Copyright Group (USCG) has filed a lawsuit against thousands of as yet unknown people who may (or may not) have downloaded or uploaded movies on file sharing networks.  The strategy, which has been employed by others in the past,  is to file or threaten to file a lawsuit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A group called the U.S. Copyright Group (USCG) has filed a lawsuit against thousands of as yet unknown people who may (or may not) have downloaded or uploaded movies on file sharing networks.  The strategy, which has been employed by others in the past,  is to file or threaten to file a lawsuit and then offer to settle for a few thousand.  Defending a copyright lawsuit will almost certainly cost much more so the offer is tempting. Plus, copyright law allows statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work, so the potential risk can be severe.  </p>
<p>One problem with employing this strategy on the scale that the USCG is doing is that it will almost certainly result in a large number wrongly identified people who feel compelled to pay up because its cheaper than fighting.  It undermines rights to privacy and anonymity.  Furthermore, it doesn&#8217;t get to the real issue of how to compensate artists for their work.  Lawsuits can&#8217;t possibly be a realistic long-term business model.</p>
<p>As far as I know, the USCG only has a large list of suspect IP addresses and is currently attempting to obtain the identities of people so they can give them the pay up or go to court offer. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has created a resource for people who are faced with responding to a subpoena and would like advice with responding.  I have volunteered to work with people in Minnesota who are faced with this situation.  There are other attorneys in other states who have volunteered as well.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/issues/file-sharing/subpoena-defense">The EFF Subpoena Defense Attorney List</a><br />
<a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2010/06/02">The EFF&#8217;s press release about the case.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/why-i-volunteered-for-the-eff/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-bomb Trademarks</title>
		<link>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/f-trademarks</link>
		<comments>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/f-trademarks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2(a)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immoral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandalous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark registration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godfreadlaw.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the several reasons your trademark might be refused registration by the USPTO is that your proposed mark is scandalous or immoral.  Without too much further explanation you might guess that a certain word starting with &#8220;F&#8221; and rhyming with &#8220;duck&#8221; might be problematic as a trademark.  You would be right.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the several reasons your trademark might be refused registration by the USPTO is that your proposed mark is scandalous or immoral.  Without too much further explanation you might guess that a certain word starting with &#8220;F&#8221; and rhyming with &#8220;duck&#8221; might be problematic as a trademark.  You would be right.   Trademarks can be refused registration for being scandalous or immoral.  Now you might think that this is America and you can say what the F&#8212; you want, and you can.  But at least for now, you aren&#8217;t going to get the US government to help you protect that as a brand name.</p>
<p>But many people do try anyway.  In fact, if you search the <a href="http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp">USPTO</a> for applications for marks containing that word, you will see nothing but refusals (were 0 for 53 so far), probably causing the applicants to shout . . .  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/f-trademarks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunshine Week is March 14-20</title>
		<link>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/sunshine-week-is-march-14-20</link>
		<comments>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/sunshine-week-is-march-14-20#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public domain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.godfreadlaw.com/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Sunshine Week is a national initiative to open a dialogue about the importance of open government and freedom of information. Participants include print, broadcast and online news media, civic groups, libraries, nonprofits, schools and others interested in the public&#8217;s right to know.&#8221;  See more information at www.sunshineweek.org

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sunshine Week is a national initiative to open a dialogue about the importance of open government and freedom of information. Participants include print, broadcast and online news media, civic groups, libraries, nonprofits, schools and others interested in the public&#8217;s right to know.&#8221;  See more information at <a href="http://www.sunshineweek.org">www.sunshineweek.org</a><br />
<img src="http://www.sunshineweek.org/portals/0/images/yrtkv.jpg" alt="Your Right To Know" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.godfreadlaw.com/index.php/2010/sunshine-week-is-march-14-20/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

